Windows IT Pro is the authoritative and independent resource for windows nt, windows 2000, windows 2003, windows xp. Features a collection of resources and magazines for windows IT professionals.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


June 2002

Geographically Distributed Clustering


RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Clustering and Load Balancing Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

A comparison of 3 impressive products

Clustering solutions let you boost the availability, reliability, and scalability of Windows-based servers. A typical clustering configuration that addresses availability consists of two or more like nodes, typically connected to a shared storage subsystem. When these nodes function in an active-active configuration, the workload is distributed between the cluster nodes; however, the typical purpose of a cluster is to permit failover in the event of an application or hardware failure—an active- passive configuration.

A variation on the active-passive clustering configuration uses data replication instead of shared storage. Data replication offers the possibility of clustering across a wide-area link. Products that support this type of cluster offer many appealing benefits beyond the disaster tolerance that geographically dispersed data affords. For example, the ability to specify different hardware configurations for each node decreases hardware costs. Additionally, the existence of a replicated data source can be extremely useful when you're performing data backup, application testing, and OS migration and testing.

I gathered three sample products that accommodate replication-based clustering with failover—Computer Associates' (CA's) Bright-Stor High-Availability Manager (formerly known as SurviveIT 2000); NSI Software's Double-Take for Windows 2000/NT 4.1; and Legato Systems' Legato Octopus for Windows NT and 2000 4.2. (Legato has since renamed its Octopus product Legato RepliStor and released version 5.0.) I tested these products' ability to maintain recoverability and high availability in a variety of failure situations. I also looked at unique capabilities that might make each product more suitable for a given application. VERITAS Software's VERITAS Cluster Server 2.0 for Windows 2000 and SteelEye Technology's LifeKeeper for Windows 2000 4.0 offer similar capabilities but were unavailable for testing.

The Test Environment
For the test environment, I used SHUNRA Software's SHUNRA\
Cloud to emulate a T1 frame relay circuit between the two cluster nodes. The primary node was a Hewlett-Packard HP NetServer LT 6000r with six 550MHz Pentium III Xeon processors running Win2K Advanced Server as an application and file server. The secondary node was a 2-way 550MHz Pentium III server, also running Win2K AS.

To test failover capabilities, I used three unique scenarios for the server: that of a typical file server, that of a Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 server, and that of a Microsoft SQL Server 7.0 server. For each scenario, I removed network connectivity to cause a node failure, then performed a manual failover (typically a button or menu option). During failover, I monitored the time each product required to detect and act on a failed node and evaluated the effectiveness of each product's procedures for recovering from a failure and starting a manual failover.

Installation and Configuration
As part of its simple installation process, BrightStor High-Availability Manager prompts you to select which of the software's four components—Server, Console, Alert, Application Notes—you want to install. (The product documentation recommends that you install all four components.) After the 2-minute installation on my primary node, I needed to restart the server. I then repeated the installation process on my secondary node.

Double-Take's installation was equally straightforward, but the software also prompted me to answer a few optimization-related questions. I specified the size and location of a pagefile that Double-Take would use to buffer data during heavy replication traffic, and I specified that I would be using transactional applications (SQL Server and Exchange). The installation process created security groups for Double-Take administration and quickly installed the necessary files before prompting for a required reboot. I repeated the procedure on the secondary node.

Octopus's installation process was quick and easy, letting me install the software on the local and remote servers from one location in a matter of minutes. The process required minimal configuration and didn't require a server restart.

BrightStor High-Availability Manager
Contact: Computer Associates * 631-342-6000 or 800-225-5224
Web: http://www.ca.com
Price: $2495 per replicated server

   Previous  [1]  2  3  4  5  Next 


Reader Comments
This is a great article - thanks !
Do you have comparison of those products with
Microsoft Clustering product ?

Arie Blum June 16, 2002


Why did you test with Exchange 5.5? Because most vendors couldn't support failover with Exchange 2000 yet? That is the question we really wanted answered... too bad.

Jeremy Vignaux July 31, 2002


Jeremy Vignaux you are quite correct, the only real way to provide automatic failover of Exchange 2000 is using MSCS. However you will find useful information on using Double-Take with Exchange 2000 at: http://192.168.0.100:3501/WhitePapers/Exchange2KDR.pdf

Ian Masters November 25, 2002


I understood the point of this article to be a test of some data replication alternatives to Microsoft's shared resource clustering of Windows 2000 Server. If Ed Roth tested these products as alternatives to Windows clustering, then why did he install Win2k Advanced Server on the test servers instead of Windows 2000 Server?

James Kidwell March 09, 2003


How can you title and article “Geographically Dispersed Clustering” mention anything about "geographically dispersed clustering." This is an article about “Clustering Alternatives to MSCS" not geographic clusters. If you wanted to talk about geographic clusters, how come you don't mention anything about the possible MSCS configurations?

How do you write a geographically dispersed clustering article for a Windows environment and not mention EMC's GeoSpan for MSCS? This product was partially (if not wholly) responsible for the creation of the "Cluster/Geographic" category on Microsoft's HCL.

While I do think that the content of your article is valuable, I think your title is very misleading.

John Toner May 16, 2003


I did my own testing using DoubleTake and arrived

Jim Calvin July 18, 2003


I noticed that SteelEye LifeKeeper is not on this list of products.
Anyone considering replication and clustering should also take a look at SteelEye LifeKeeper as it takes an application-centric view of clustering. Making the application highly available, not just the hardware and data.

Shobana Patel September 25, 2003


I use Double-Take to replicate Exchange 2000 mailstores and trans logs across a WAN, from one MSCS cluster to another MSCS cluster. The remote cluster uses Geocluster+ to simplify hard drive configuration. My mailstores total 120Gb, and I generate about 6Gb in trans logs each day. I am not using automatic failover - manual only, by choice. I'm using V4.3 SP2, and the system works very well.

Bob April 13, 2004


I agree with John Toner. Even though your article is helpful and informative it's really about replication tools that leverage mscs. When I look for information about geography distributed clusters I'm looking for shared disk scenarios over long distances (active active or active passive). If you have any information or know how on this type of implementation please share it with us.

Rafael Cruz June 09, 2004


We used a UK company called TriSys, they know all these products and recommended us with the best fit solution. We use Geospan and it has not let us down yet!

Anonymous User November 12, 2004


 See More Comments  1   2 

You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

New Microsoft/Yahoo! Deal? No

On Sunday, the Times of London reported that Microsoft had renewed talks with failing Internet giant Yahoo! and would manage its search engine for 10 years, while Yahoo! would retain control of its email, messaging, and content services. This report ...

How can I stop and start services from the command line?

...


Windows OSs Whitepapers Why SaaS is the Right Solution for Log Management

Related Events Virtualization, Automation and Databases

Virtualization for Mission-Critical BI with SQL Server

SQL Consolidation: Insights from Customers, Analysts & HP

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

Windows OSs eBooks Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

A Guide to Windows Certification and Public Keys

SQL Server Administration for Oracle DBAs

Related Windows OSs Resources Become a VIP member of the Windows IT Pro community!
Get it all with the VIP CD and VIP access. A $500+ value for only $279!

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!
Solve your toughest technical problems with our experts and access 10,000 + articles online. 30% off

Monthly Online Pass - Only $5.95!
Get instant access to 10,000+ articles from Windows IT Pro Magazine!

TechNet Virtual Labs
Evaluate and test Microsoft's newest products.


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro Windows Dev Pro IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technology Resource Directory Connected Home Windows Excavator Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 Copyright © 2008 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Terms and Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing